| #1 ThanatoZ[50735] |
| AC91A118.ipt.aol.com |
Whew that BR took forever!
Please give me any comments you may have (but only the good ones please). :) Hope you liked it, or maybe I should put it this way, this BR took me a week to do, you damn well BETTER like it! :p |
| #2 King_[LSRS-13][50738] |
| c1081558-a.clmba1.mo.home.com |
First non author and I DID read it
|
| #3 King_[LSRS-13][50739] |
| c1081558-a.clmba1.mo.home.com |
Now, that I have that, it was a nice little thang, you know? I give it a six because it had some pictures over the typing. Well, that's my two cents.
Later
King |
| #4 ThanatoZ[50740] |
| AC91A118.ipt.aol.com |
That was kinda wierd... I did preview, and it looked fine, but now its messed... Kinda odd.
Ouch, a 6? |
| #5 Hostile~SCV[50743] |
| lov-ky3a-85.rasserver.net |
Nice story... mine was just a plain game. you had some picture problems with the text, i see, but i could read everything still.
8 |
| #6 CynicalMagician[50748] |
| 24.69.48.13 |
I loved the title pic. A couple pics didn't load, and there were some clipping errors on text surrounding images, but a very solid 8. A less narrow format might be nice for the future.
-CynicalMagician |
| #7 [HK]Grin'in[50752] |
| 254.0212.mel.iprimus.net.au |
| I'm so stupid, I should have known he would still would have gone for nukes in the re-match because everyone knows nobody nuke-rushes only every once and a while, if they do it they do it all the time. Or they had alternative motivations. I had no excuse for the lack of detection ecept for that I was betting he wouldn't nuke-rush again, after his last dismal effort. A third match?? |
#8 [50761] |
| 208.196.35.239 |
Haha, that was pathetic. I especially love the "nuke rush against zerg" strat. hahaha
This report was very silly and a little long. Probably could have left out the first two games and just went with the last two.
The nuke GIFs were done well and its obvious you put a lot of work into this even though you had some wraparound problems. If it was funnier, or if the games had been more interesting I would give this an 8, but as it is right now, I'll have to go with a 7.
Cheers,
Dref |
#9 [50762] |
| 208.196.35.239 |
To clarify, I meant the nuke rushing player was pathetic, not the report. Gotta be careful about how I'm throwing pronouns around... :)
Dref |
| #10 ThanatoZ[50784] |
| 98AF8083.ipt.aol.com |
| Don't go after ToasTeR about not using a good strat, think of this along the lines of Drefsab's BGH strats of the day. The point is entertainment, not strategy. :) |
| #11 ovinder[50819] |
| iridium-asy-87.rutgers.edu |
good report, fresh idea.
Actually, this report is good grist for those who want to think strategy. People usually go straight up the linear terran tech tree until they get to Sci vessels, then stop there until they're further into the game. Early nukes really are a viable way to break through toss defences.
Dunno, thinking out loud here, but how about a major infantry build-up with nuke support, instead of heavy metal? If you take out the lead cannons, stimmed bats supported by medics can charge in and take out zeals well, making it hard to use storm as effectively as against the usual terran ranged attacks by rines, tanks & vultures. Send in a couple of stimmed bats to specifically target temps as you send in the forces, and then say "Wheeeee".
Kind of like a ling attack, except that the bats would have a tougher time against goons than against zeals, instead of the other way around for lings. Stim would be the difference there, I think, that could make this strat work.
But I ramble and DTs would still be a major headache with a nuke / bat / medic attack, as would a heavy goon rusher. |
| #12 [GoA]~Toaster~[50835] |
| ppp189.169-96-207.hull.mt.videotron.net |
Thanks Drefsab!
I should have won the game where I nuked the zerg
but it was just funny, havig for all defence 3 marins, a ghost and a full nuke silo
and using this strat vs a protoss who have gone DT is a scuicide, since you used your CC for the sile, no comsat, and you don't have enough gas to do anything else
but it was funny :) |
| #13 [GoA]~RaVeN~[50840] |
| modemcable213.189-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net |
| toaster, your my hero! can i get bread please ? |
| #14 Ramius[50855] |
| alproxy2.proxy.lucent.com |
good stuff :)
might i suggest the island-Recall-rush for your next?
8 |
| #15 Korang[50896] |
| spc-isp-wpg-uas-02-5.sprint.ca |
| i wanna see drone drop zvz reports ;( or lam0r offensive cannons, or bug abuse, or MASS SPIDER MINES, or ch33k0ry things like that, blhasdd |
| #16 ThanatoZ[50934] |
| AC9484BC.ipt.aol.com |
lol, I actually have done stuff like the mass spider mines... It's funny as hell. Maybe a BGH strat of the day, mass vultures/vulture drops?
Drefsab: Do you mind if I make a BGH strat of the day, as you were the first person to do it, don't wanna the rip the idea off... |
| #17 2Inadequate[50968] |
| 120.chicago-18-19rs.il.dial-access.att.net |
| Another good nuke strat is to go DOUBLE nuke rush. It takes a bit more time, but u can do it in decent time w/ 1 tank.... and if u'r opponent hasn't expanded and both nukes land, he's dead. Good report, I couldn't see some of the text, but that was ok. |
| #18 ThanatoZ[74149] |
| spider-tl071.proxy.aol.com |
| Oh btw Korang, if you want offensive cannons, I have a report of that too.. ;) Check out a search under my name. |
| #19 RED X[148311] |
| hnllhi1-ar3-4-42-103-063.hnllhi1.dsl-verizon.net |
| RED X |