Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"so yes, we aer the elitie. you are the peasants, the mindless bottom sucking scum, whom we step on and generally ignore. =)"
-Sp|ne




#1 SandTrap[131021]
66-169-119-175.ftwrth.tx.charter.com
1st, w00t
#2 YourButteredBiscuit[131022]
24-90-13-224.si.rr.com
I just noticed I left the gametype as starcraft. For those who don't know, this is a report on Red Alert 2, if you're going to bother reading this one, you may as well read part one first.
#3 Dist[131023]
dhcp80ffca51.residence-rooms.uiowa.edu
I'm curious as to why you posted a text only as a two-parter.
#4 TIME is not on YOUR SIDE[131024]
209.234.157.160
2
#5 [131025]
h204n1fls32o814.telia.com
#3: I'm guessing there will be more parts... (I never did understand ppl who comment before they read :)

Why split up... not my question to answer but when did I ever care about that? Combining the (at least three) parts would generate massive amounts of text with (as stated) no pictures. That would look like a very heavy read. Now it's more like episodes of some TV show... only this is entertaining. Fun in good sized chunks.

Gogogo... I wanna read part 3! :)
(hopes it's a long game)




#6 Berra[131026]
h204n1fls32o814.telia.com
Oops... #5 == Berra :P

- Berra

#7 YourButteredBiscuit[131028]
24-90-13-224.si.rr.com
"Combining the (at least three) parts would generate massive amounts of text with (as stated) no pictures. That would look like a very heavy read."

Couldn't have said it better.

#8 TIME is not on YOUR SIDE[131029]
209.234.157.163
breaking reports into parts (especially short reports like yours) is not encouraged.
#9 CrazyGoNuts[131030]
1Cust191.tnt1.huntington-beach2.ca.da.uu.net
your not encouraged to give advice, you know that?
#10 Razoriel[131033]
CPE-203-45-77-24.nsw.bigpond.net.au
I don't see the point of the Kirov Airships, so I never build them (a sloth would outstrip them with the airship having a day head start), but their bombs are cool.

TIME, to be allowed to insult people, you have to have done something equally good, or better, which you haven't done.

#11 Jacko3334[131037]
CPE-203-51-186-180.vic.bigpond.net.au
Kirovs have their moments, just not many of them.
#12 Chris[131043]
mitchellvilleia-240.iowa.prairieinet.net
Same as first.
#13 YourButteredBiscuits[131044]
24-90-13-224.si.rr.com
If you're going to use kirovs, you'd better use them right. If you use them right, and escort them correctly you will pretty much have the game under control. Of course, chances are, they're just going to get shot down.
#14 LameJoker[131046]
216.127.82.97
In my understanding, an absolute prerequisite for Kirov use is that the map be all land, or Aegis will absolutely pwn them. Then, the standard counter will be (at least the way I do it) rocketeers. If the sovs have 1/4 of a brain, they bring up the flakers to slaugher the rocketeers. Then, the allies call in the tanks to wipe the flakers all over the ground, the sovs counter agian with their stronger rhinos, and you just get a full blown land battle when you bargained for an aireal steamroll.

Have you ever seen the absolute pwnage of an elite Aegis?
Prolly has a cooldown of about 1/4 of a second, can slaughter infinte Kirovs.


#15 YourButteredBiscuit[131047]
24-90-13-224.si.rr.com
If its in the sky, an Aegis cruiser will murder it. Jacko3334 said it best, Kirovs have their moments, just not many of them.

But when they do, they are undeniably badassed.

#16 LameJoker[131048]
216.127.82.97
I have to say it:

Chrono everything wipes Sov ass.

legionares in IFVs
legionares in choppers
cronosphered tanks into water
cronosphered ships onto land

And teh best:
legionnares in Super-IFV/Moving bunker/steamroller thing









#17 god[131049]
pool-64-222-170-39.man.east.verizon.net
delete
#18 TIME is not on YOUR SIDE[131050]
209.234.157.163
I have done something better, I AM VEMPTED! Morons.
#19 CrackHeadJeb - Rater Without a Tag[131059]
mu-197049.dhcp.missouri.edu
I'll wait on rating until all parts of the report are finished. I think that's the policy now.

The writing here is good. Did I say that your writing reminded me of Heartcutter's? Probably. I have to keep typing that recurring thought, though, or else it'll keep bouncing around in my head.

-CHJ

#20 OfficerofDeath[131068]
ACAF16B5.ipt.aol.com
Gee, taking long enough you poor fool? Only played the game a month ago, so no time like now, and no day like today, right?
#21 ZerG~LinG[131088]
p405-057.ppp.get2net.dk
Like the others said, keep it in one part.
Actually I don't think this is half-assed at all, and I like your writing. The facts that its on red alert 2 is pretty cool as well.
I played it a lot when it came out, and all I remember is how the US were fucking imbalanced and owned a bunch :)
#22 Razoriel[131181]
CPE-203-45-77-24.nsw.bigpond.net.au
When does the next part come out? And do you think you could make more RA 2 reports in the future?
#23 pop_killer[131442]
Toronto-HSE-ppp3756562.sympatico.ca
IT'S A REPORT OF WHICH GAME???
#24 RabidChicken[131883]
ip-pa-jtown-24-159-011-068.charterpa.com
Which game are you typing about? You put the game type under SC and its something not-SC! It was great though, and if I understood it (I play SC only) I definatly would of liked it more. GOOD JOB!



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report