| #1 PsiStorm3328[132315] |
| cache-ntc-ad01.proxy.aol.com |
Wo0t! First on BR again. 0.o
(____) |
| #2 PsiStorm3328[132316] |
| cache-ntc-ad01.proxy.aol.com |
| darn didnt work, oh well, still #1. o.0 |
| #3 nrkizt[132317] |
| 12-211-4-103.client.attbi.com |
3rd!
That's some pretty funny ass shit.
Ownage by ogres, lol |
| #4 PsiStorm3328[132318] |
| cache-ntc-ad01.proxy.aol.com |
Lessons To Be Learned
----------------------
1) Ogres own j0o.
2) Peasants Can Be Funny
3) Archmage Is NOT Invincible
4) Put at least SOME buildings in your main.
5) Place Spells in the Right Place
6) Offensive Farms pwn j0o
I loved the stuff that the peasant was saying. And it was funny how after he died you had that picture of all the heros saying amen and all that. LOL! |
| #5 XMrNiceguyX[132319] |
| f33030.upc-f.chello.nl |
hoho, hilareous :)
Would have loved to see the replay :) |
| #6 kool[132320] |
| 202.130.71.78 |
| 6th ownage. beautiful |
| #7 Me[132321] |
| scf1.wc.optusnet.com.au |
a bit one sided :)
but very funny |
| #8 plus2longsword[132322] |
| asc8-grr-ip072.wmis.net |
| Im not sure what to make of this. Damn funny game though. If that mage had bothered to pick up the egg I might have thought they had some sort of strategy and with the drake being the culminating point of their strategy. Still, a drake wouldnt be able to take out two bases with towers, even if it didn't disappear after 180 seconds. |
| #9 Grengor[132324] |
| 139.134.58.153 |
Funny shit.
Probably a 8-9
Who were those retards anyway??????????? |
| #10 BOBBY357[132325] |
| cache-ra01.proxy.aol.com |
| LOL! That's some pretty funny stuff. |
| #11 Redemption6[132326] |
| cache-1.sbo.ma.webcache.rcn.net |
| lol nice game....7 |
| #12 endersshadow[132328] |
| ool-182ea1c4.dyn.optonline.net |
| didn't read it yet but scrollin down to comments it looked pertty. |
| #13 LameJoker[132329] |
| ip-209-23-3-68.modem.logical.net |
Hahaha FE FI FO FUM made me laugh.
"Dad always thougth laughter was the best medicince, which I guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis."
- Jack Handy |
| #14 obsidian[132330] |
| comm700-b0701-dhcp122.bu.edu |
| A bit wide on my screen, but still pretty damn funny. I'd say 8 just cause it wasn't that serious of a game, and there was some wierd grammar in places .. still very entertaining to read. gg Ogres. |
| #15 [132332] |
| mnet-baca244-13-199.monarch.net |
| good stuff, really funny. i would have been nice if the drake had been usedd and turned things around tho :) |
| #16 LameJoker stop getting quotes from your dad[132338] |
| 168.53.109.33 |
this guys were more like on crack or something
lol,the farms....ROLFMAO
hrmm,they didnt have much anti-air...the drake coulda prolly helped orange get started with something,with all that cash they could turtle up pretty nice...yum cannon towers...
|
| #17 these*[132339] |
| 168.53.109.33 |
| sorry that annoys me,if I dont correct that |
| #18 I_am_Nitros[132340] |
| h64-141-25-41.sunwave.net |
| Haha 8.5 for the humour :D |
| #19 Ogre_Lord[132341] |
| h64-141-25-41.sunwave.net |
| ME SMASH YOU! WHAT YOU LOOKIN AT? US PWN ALL! SMASH! CRUSH! STOMP! |
| #20 DarkRider[132342] |
| 198.134.2.2 |
| lol |
| #21 pop_killer[132343] |
| Toronto-HSE-ppp3757921.sympatico.ca |
| fucking warcraft 3 |
| #22 STUPID SC PEOPLE[132345] |
| 168.53.109.33 |
| sure,go ahead keep telling yourself SC>WC3 |
#23  [132358] |
| nr11-216-196-188-43.fuse.net |
| Wow. 10. |
| #24 TheyAre[132360] |
| bess-proxy.wiu.k12.pa.us |
The Ogre Mafia is not to be messed with...
The Peasant Loser's League is.
And those offensive Altars...
Just say that to yourself. "Offensive... Altars?"
And they didn't even place them well.
Anyway, LoL, GG, 8. |
| #25 MistaSparkle[132365] |
| iprism.lcusd.net |
| coooool. easy 9.65231 |
| #26 ~chobo~[132372] |
| CPE014060001930.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
wow, this was really funny.
an interesting game to say the least as well
do it more :) |
| #27 Decay[132378] |
| 206.10.109.51 |
Easy gold, plz make more. Only thing wrong with the pics was the lack of a border, but otherwise they were informative and and funny. The text was good as well, with only a few minor errors. GW!
~Decay |
| #28 endersshadow[132388] |
| ool-182ea1c4.dyn.optonline.net |
am i the only one who didn't really enjoy that? Sure, it was funny with team 1 sucking so much, but it got old real fast. I mean, the Ogre 5 Humans(or whatever)2 got really old and sort of hurt the report in my opinion. Also, i know that the game sucked and all, but u should take out some pictures. Oh well, thats just my opinion. overall, i'd say gj for your first report.
7.0 |
| #29 SynicInc[132391] |
| justin.ucsd.edu |
| Hilarious game. Not much makes me laugh, but this did. Pls make more. |
| #30 endersshadow[132397] |
| ool-182ea1c4.dyn.optonline.net |
| 30 comments and still no rater? |
| #31 XF_illuZion[132400] |
| c-24-125-24-83.va.client2.attbi.com |
Landazar vs Ogres
Pay-Per-View |
| #32 blizzar89[132402] |
| A253170.N1.Vanderbilt.Edu |
Good report! The game wasn't all that good but your humourus writing and good pictures helped it alot. I also didn't, like the whole Ogres 3 Players 0 thing. Kinda took away from the report, but the rest was great.
I'd give it a 7.5 |
#33  [132404] |
| dhcp16635021.neo.rr.com |
| some of us have jobs, y'know. =P |
| #34 Nightwisp[132407] |
| cache-dc05.proxy.aol.com |
| On the same level as CB. This deserves a mention on the front page. HILARIOUSLY HISTERICALLY FUNNY. 9.92234 |
| #35 pop_killer[132409] |
| Toronto-HSE-ppp3757921.sympatico.ca |
SC > wc3.
you fuckin bitches |
| #36 Chris[132410] |
| astound-64-85-237-205.ca.astound.net |
| Your report was good. Funny and informative, and well worth anyone's time. 9.0 |
| #37 UltimateFire[132411] |
| cache-ntc-ad01.proxy.aol.com |
| the pictures seemed clunky, for instance you could have photoshopped the peasent saying things into the picture instead of just having text after it, and many things could have been cropped better. Overall though, it was a hilarious game, and you managed to portray that, even though some things got old before you had used them half as much as you were going to. But good report in general, specially for first time. |
| #38 Convider[132412] |
| Toronto-HSE-ppp3661113.sympatico.ca |
| nice..... 9-ish... some funny shit in there dude |
| #39 Bingo-Pants[132415] |
| CPE0080c6efd1da.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
| funny, but both teams sound unbelievably terrible |
| #40 Rubilacx (Part 1)[132417] |
| 164.58.125.235 |
*unsheates a freshly-sharpened smack sword and proceeds to use it liberally, primary targets being pop and TIME should the latter post here*
Stating "WC3 > SC", "SC > WC3", and other variants is an impressive demonstration of absolute lack of logical sense. It is fruitless to compare these two games because these two games are NOT the same type of RTS. They are built on different RTS philosophies. In the few areas where they are similar, WC3 = SC, or to please you practically fanatical SC idolizers, SC = WC3 (there I put it first, happy now?).
|
| #41 Rubilacx (Part 2)[132418] |
| 164.58.125.235 |
You call WC3 a children's game (refer to a TIME comment down the list on Poo's report), yet in these comment columns and possibly in forum posts (I look at the forums once in a technicolor moon, but it wouldn't suprise me if this same matter is in there too.) you resort to, well, CHILDISH measures to advocate your own RTS game preferences. I won't elaborate on what that smell is, but I'll give you a hint, it begins with an H...
Please get it into your brick wall-thick, SC-logo tatooed head that, to adopt TIME's method of emphasizing his screen name, YOU are NOT the WORLD. You not liking WC3 does not automatically make everyone else not like WC3, and everyone else is NOT retarded because they do not adopt your dogma. Some people are not interested in SC's macro-based, big battle strategy engine (I for one DETEST it, but that's as far as I'll put my own preferences into this, unlike another pair of people we know and love). |
| #42 Rubilacx (Part 3)[132419] |
| 164.58.125.235 |
These people could be potentially great players except for that one factor, in this case blind macro for macro's sake, that they either don't like or no matter how they try cannot become good at.
WC3 is an RTS better suited to these types of players. Battles are smaller scale with a bigger emphasis on actual battles and the power and importance of individual units than management of half a dozen bases and impersonal, homogenous numbers. It is not a micro-based strategy engine, I grant that, but a hero-based strategy engine that put's one (or two or three) special units in the driver's seat. This appeals to gamers who like the medieval concepts of single combat and personal glory, and, I repeat, these people are NOT retarded for having this preference. |
| #43 Rubilac (Part 4)[132421] |
| 164.58.125.235 |
Whether WC3 or SC needs more micro is (or should be) an irrelevant point, because the potential for winning games is (or should be) in the mind of the gamer, not his mouse finger.
I could put down so much more, but this has already gotten way too long for a comment post as it is (as it has required 4 slots), so I'll end it here.
Rubilaxc, the sword of King Arthur's long-lost dyslexic brother.
|
| #44 obsidian[132425] |
| comm700-b0701-dhcp122.bu.edu |
| Rubliac's comments = 10 |
| #45 Agent_of_Sol[132435] |
| d101.hallowell01.swarthmore.edu |
| Why can't *I* ever play such stupid people? |
| #46 endersshadow[132441] |
| ool-182ea1c4.dyn.optonline.net |
| lol sorry Snowsquall i'll try and remember that next time :o |
| #47 TIME is not on YOUR SIDE[132443] |
| h0010b59c54e2.ne.client2.attbi.com |
Wc3 is NOT an rts. It is a sick mutation of hack 'n' slash lvl up hero (like diablo2) and RTS (like SC).
I can imagine the thought through blizz's head:
"Diablo 2 was popular...Starcraft was popular...HEY! LETS COMBINE THE 2!"
"Duh, good idea, boss."
sc is more competitive , FULLY BALANCED( probably the most balanced rts ever), not-based-on-luck game. Its perfect for competitive tournament play, which is what the real gamer wants.
if u wanna play a game based on luck for the most part thats not anyway near balanced and not very competitive at all (wc3) then be my guest. Youll get bored of it in a few months, like I have.
Im still addicted to starcraft after 3 years of playing it. Its a masterpiece. Good day, madam. |
| #48 simeon2k4[132444] |
| 12.109.125.163 |
Fairly funny report. You shoulda stopped the "Ogres vs. Players" after 4 or 5 points though.
Pretty horrible game, but some pretty funny stuff happened. Good score for a humorous report.
On SC vs. WC3:
It's not that SC is better or worse than WC3, they're just two different games. Time is right, WC3 is a mix of diablo and SC, with more SC elements but enough Diablo so that you notice it. I prefer straight SC's formula, but that doesn't make it better. Others might like like the mix. It's sorta innovative... sorta.
SC != WC3 is the correct programming pseudocode, in other words. |
| #49 TIME is a FAG[132446] |
| 168.53.109.33 |
omg,how many years and patches did it take to balane SC?
how long has WC3 been out?
STFU YOU FUKIN MORON |
| #50 Vengeanceismine[132447] |
| fw-1.rsv.fw.earthlink.net |
| Absolute noobs! I can't believe this game. |
| #51 TIME is not on YOUR SIDE[132448] |
| h0010b59c54e2.ne.client2.attbi.com |
| ok #49, u are an idiot. You see, the way war3 is made it will never be balanced ever. U know items? Some items > other items of the same lvl? So people get a tome of exp and u get a tome of agility...or u get a robe of the magi +6 and the enemy gets a mask of death. Its not balanced, and it will never be. Items make it imbalanced. |
| #52 Rubilacx[132453] |
| 164.58.125.235 |
*finds a spot on the now well-worn smack sword that's not bloodied yet and proceeds to rectify that situation*
I'd rather play a cliffhangar-style RTS/RPG (there I granted your classification of WC3, is your reproductive fluid flow conduit extended to full length yet?) with a chance for luck to let you get back in the game if you didn't do so hot at first than a pure RTS where almost every game among above-average to professionals is an exhausting war of attrition that sometimes may only be concluded when the map is mined out or one player just can't raise their finger again to queue yet another meat sack of 4-5 -insert commonly massed unit name here) |
| #53 Rubilacx (Part 2B)[132455] |
| 164.58.125.235 |
I don't care if WC3 is balanced or not, and I am of the opinion anyway that it IS balanced, if only players would cease being 'weather' players (playing whatever has been deemed the 'best' strats with whoever has been deemed the 'best' race at that patching moment) and atleast try to find new ways to use units. I remember one time winning an Orc vs Human when a handful Raiders Ensnared the Peasants building an expansion town hall and then left immediately (using Ensnare doesn't trigger an attack alert if you don't damage the Peasants). The nets cancelled their orders to build, and by the time the Human player realized his Peasants were idle the town hall had gone unbuilt for a full 3 minutes.
That's the kind of gaming scenario I, and maybe a few others, happen to like, where those small nontraditional actions can reap big dividends. |
| #54 Rubilacx (Part 3B)[132456] |
| 164.58.125.235 |
And regarding item imbalance, you should know that the items most likely to turn important battles on merchant-carrying maps (wands of negation, scrolls of protection, extra TPs, potions) are all readily available to any player in the game with enough gold. If the map doesn't have merchants and your derriere gets twisted into kaiser rolls over possible item imbalances, then don't play non-merchant maps. Multiple maps is a balancing factor of any RTS, and yes, God forbid, that includes SC.
And if your opponent manages to steal all the ToE-possible creeps on the map and get a Mask of Death from a big creeping spot then you might want to check the efficiency of your Aggressiveness Department. And I'd better stop now before I take up 4 comment slots AGAIN.
Rubilacx, the sword of King Arthur's long-lost dyslexic brother |
| #55 TIME is not on YOUR SIDE[132457] |
| h0010b59c54e2.ne.client2.attbi.com |
Ok, warcraft 3 has a LOT more massing than SC does. Sc requires a mix of 3 or 4 units in most strategies. You obviously have no experience playing it.
In war3, heres the massing list:
Huntresses/Dyrads
Sorcs/Gryphons
Ghouls/gargs
Massing anyone of those units in that race can win u the game pretty damn easily with a 1 or 2 heroes. I didnt include any orc units because orc right now is the most balanced race, albeit the weakest one. Orcs have to mix ALOT in order to compete, and sadly they still cant win most units en masse.
As for items, A robe of the magi and mask of death are the same item lvl. After we both kill 2 lvl 10 dragons, I get mask of death and u get robe of the magi. Is that fair at all? LoL, I think not. Same applies for crown of kings. Crown of kings is useless compared to mask of death, yet they are both the same lvl.
War3 will never be balanced =/ |
| #56 I_am_Nitros[132467] |
| h64-141-25-41.sunwave.net |
| Unless you take out items all together except for the ones you can buy at the goblin merchant.. <---Good idea :) |
| #57 -Patton-[132468] |
| cache-ra01.proxy.aol.com |
Bah, they're both good games. Can't we all just get along? If you don't like War3 or SC, then don't play that particular game. Easy as that.
Now to the report. I thought it was awesome. Pics were good, humor was great, and writing was fair. Offensive farms kick ass. In the words of god:
"Good job, my son. I laughed my ass off."
9 |
| #58 TIME is not on YOUR SIDE[132475] |
| h0010b59c54e2.ne.client2.attbi.com |
| zergling rushes never work on good players, try that shit on me and i kick your ass. |
| #59 I_am_Nitros[132476] |
| h64-141-25-41.sunwave.net |
| Unless the zergling rusher is a good player too.. instead of a newb. |
| #60 LameJoker[132477] |
| ip-209-23-1-178.modem.logical.net |
I don't care how good you are TIME (if indeed you are good), you can't stop 10 control groups of lings(with a few ovies and devs)!!!
I've always wondered if thats even possible. |
| #61 simeon2k4[132513] |
| dhcp16657038.neo.rr.com |
| ... can't stop 10 control groups of lings? Pfft. |
| #62 ............[132526] |
| HSE-MTL-ppp66716.qc.sympatico.ca |
| It would have been really funny if after all those kills, the ogres, tired of the incompetence, decided to own everybody. Actually I was expecting it to happen, and I was subsequently disapointed. Anyways, I need sleep, uhhh an 8? |
| #63 IcE-Inforcer[132530] |
| proxy.ia2.marketscore.com |
Hmm.... i oughta try stopping lings with devs...
Anyways, long report... not reading now. I need sleep too. It's 3 o'clock for god sake.
-IcE- |
| #64 IcE-Inforcer[132531] |
| proxy.ia2.marketscore.com |
| Btw time whats your name on Bw? I wanna have u a game. |
| #65 ZeaL[132543] |
| proxy.ia3.marketscore.com |
Um yah, if Zerg is stupid enough to send his lings in a line with attack-move.
Anyway, funny stuff, poor newbs, 9 :) |
| #66 ZeaL[132544] |
| proxys.sjc.marketscore.com |
| Btw, screw it with the items, item imbalance is a load of shit u know, tomes are tomes, if u get an experiance tome, your lcuky, so what, creep some more and it will even out |
| #67 EMS[132546] |
| 143.229.67.249 |
I agree with TIME on the 6bats>30 lings at least at a choke, but thats not what a ling rush is. A 4 pool from someone who can really micro is hard to stop, trust me TIME,
EMS |
| #68 [132551] |
| 204.184.41.249 |
For those that wanted to know, my Battle.net moniker is San_Draco. Unfortunately, I haven't been too well as of late... Ah well.
*glances around* Personally, I'm not sure if 6 Firebats could or could not own 30 Zerglings, but then again, I'm a WarcraftIII player nowadays.
TIME: Massing units is quite a bit more dangerous in WCIII than in SC, as if you guess wrong... Well, you know. :)
Funnily enough, the massing list is one of the worst I've seen. Huntresses and Dryads? Ghouls and Gargoyles? They are severely owned by any player that knows its coming and prepares for it.
As for the items you listed... it depends on the hero. If I have a Lich or an Archmage, please give me that robe of the magi. It's a bonus to my attack, my mana, and the regeneration thereof, infinately more important to a mage than a mask of death. It depends on the hero. |
| #69 UltimateFire[132583] |
| cache-ntc-ad01.proxy.aol.com |
| Personally, I have never played WC3 on a competitive level, while I used to be moderately talented at BW. I like the fact that most units can be used for hit and run more effectively in BW than most in WC3 from what I've seen. I don't like creeps in a competitive sense, though it's fun your first couple of games to rip up the creeps =). The balance seems kind of screwy, and I like the faster kill ratio of BW, its just adds so much to the peripheral coolness by being able to have fun watching mobs of terran infantry face it off with hordes of zerg. Anyway, while WC3 could be the equal of BW, I have neither the time, nor the money, nor the computer requirements to find out. And, many pro level players say it isn't, so I'll take their word for it =). |
| #70 UltimateFire[132584] |
| cache-ntc-ad01.proxy.aol.com |
| And I should add that people randomly typing in all caps "SC > WC3 OMG LIEK TOTALLY U NOOB FAGGIT" or vice versa, doesn't help the situation at all. |
| #71 ZerG~LinG[132616] |
| p408-027.ppp.get2net.dk |
OMG would ppl stop the SC vs. War3 chats in here?
Damn funny report! Ogres own shiat.
8 |
| #72 LameJoker[132637] |
| ip-209-23-0-152.modem.logical.net |
NO I like the arguments! See, the reason you can never compare the "skill" needed in WC3 and SC is that they are different games. Say someone in WC3 is ranked #1 on the ladder, awesome, unstoppabe. This player has such 1337 skilz, they always manage to get their hero's ultimate in the first 7-8 minutes of the game, crushing his or her opponent into the ground with it.
Take that person and make him or her play SC.
They totally suck, cuz obviously theres no creeps and no heroes, no lvling up. They are the most skilled in the world at WC, but suck at SC.
|
| #73 LameJoker[132638] |
| ip-209-23-0-152.modem.logical.net |
| Its like comparing speed chess and tourny chess. Speed chess is based on spur-of-the moment decisions and fast-paced action. The world champion of speed chess would be compulsive, trusting his instincts, knowing instantly the right choice. The world champion of tourny chess (Garry Kasparov) is thoughtful, deliberate, always weighing his decisions against each other. So as you can see, there is no way to compare the "skill" of these two people. |
| #74 Illuzion[132648] |
| c-24-125-24-83.va.client2.attbi.com |
| LameJoker... about comment #75.. you are totally wrong. Take TillerMaN for example.. he is really good at starcraft and is really good at war3 also.. |
| #75 LameJoker[132652] |
| ip-209-23-1-207.modem.logical.net |
| Illuzion, I know, obviosly there are champs at WC3 that are also awesome at SC. But the point is that there *could* be someone who was great at Wc3 and bad at SC. |
| #76 Lord_Morte[132669] |
| adsl-65-65-193-200.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net |
...the #71 post was me... I'm just not sure why the name was left blank... I could have sworn I filled it in.
Anyway, I agree with LameJoker. The two are completely different games, and those that are good in both have spent quite a bit of time learning both. Really, different skills are employed in both games. |
#77  [132718] |
| lon213b.long.fsu.edu |
Funny stuff. I don't know how you managed to get that much material out of a game of this caliber but it was nicely done. Writing was pretty solid though the pic layout was a little jumbly. Try to use a few less fonts for a more professional look to them. 7.5 - 8.0.
Regards,
~CB~ |
| #78 randompersonwhocaresanyway[132784] |
| h55n1c1o1027.bredband.skanova.com |
| zergling rush? haha, it wouldn´t work even if it was chojja who pulled it. |
| #79 ElderGuardian[133004] |
| iowa-u1mkxkpvvn.student.iastate.edu |
| Hey, I've been reading all the pathetic little comments you posted after the game...can't believe you spend so much time on trifles. SC is a proven classic, WC3 is very popular...and most gameplayers are retarded freaks, interspersed with the occassional backyard Macchiaveli, as evidenced on this post as well. Realize the futility of your puny disputes and stop wasting brain cycles that could go towards making you better men...Games created by mentally underdeveloped moneygrubbers and their exploited peons working 90-hour weeks (hint: Blizzard) can't do much for improving your esthetic judgement either. Too bad I can't come off games completely myself...so I can't really blame you, as I'm in the same pit. |
| #80 .Praetor[133132] |
| 12-255-59-188.client.attbi.com |
| This is the best War3 report I've read. Ever. |
| #81 I-hate-koreans-[133921] |
| wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com |
look warcarft 3 and stacrft are good bt you can't compear them they are 2 difrent games
nmuber 1 look starcrft has too many korans and no one like the koreans they tlak to much and they ask for a re what is a re my god everytime i paly they akss for a re.
number 2 wrarcrat 3 is new game and its fun yes and sc is dold so people get bored of it the people who don't get bored of it are just pepkle who are tyring tobe good at it why try to be good at smorethnghi so old
number 3 there aer no korans in wrfract t 3 and no one lieks the korans
numbere 3 warcraft 3 has orgessa ng there is no orgs in sc haha
number 6 treh tare more races ui caanot say enoyuhg about the races you nede alot of racse or sele the game wll gte boing fast |
| #82 chris[136780] |
| AC960C72.ipt.aol.com |
| i-hate-koreans, are u 3 years old lurn how 2 make ur self some what understandable. gg tho, ogres are ownage, i wana see this rep |
| #83 Gamma Ray Burst[149336] |
| kong.Physics.Berkeley.EDU |
I thought the image:text ratio was a bit high. And as CattleBruiser pointed out, the pics were a bit jumbled.
This was my first comment on battlereports.com in years. Hehe... |
Home
Forum
Starcraft Tournaments
