Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

Bonus points for being foreign? brilliant logic, chief. You don't give mexicans telemarketing jobs do you? - The..Scarab




#1 Sabotage[151425]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
Yea sorry about before I had to adjust the width of the table.
#2 [151426]
68.79.174.39
Cool, hey you might want to close your table there at the bottom of the report.
#3 badme[151427]
pcp05314423pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net
#3
#4 .Praetor[151428]
dhcp201.des.ucdavis.edu
You called me a nice rater and put the period at the wrong end. - 3 to your score!!

Oh wait, I don't rate guides. Doh.

#5 [151430]
nr11-216-196-191-156.fuse.net
Whoa, this was kinda odd.

My problems were too-small text, a slightly odd layout and a lot of your unit/strat guides were just plain wrong. I mean, who goes firebats vs toss? Maybe if you saw mass zeals or something, but not vs your usual goon/obs/speedlot combo.

As such, I will rate this a 6.



#6 Sabotage[151431]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
yep all fixed and added johnny :]
#7 Decay[151432]
66.44.173.23
2 raters comment and I still can't read. -.-
#8 Decay[151433]
66.44.173.23
Hmm, I guess I can read now. ^^
#9 [151434]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Yeah, I'm not sure what to rate this. I mean, I really, really hate guides on this site, especially since there are at least 21671238 BW guides out there.

Not to mention the fact that many of the unit combos were indeed wrong, and you didn't explain builds or wallins too well ( if I read correctly ), which is probably the most important part of any guide.

Good writing though.

5.





#10 Sabotage[151435]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
aw crap
yea guides are ghey ;p;
#11 Sabotage[151436]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
2 failures ina row
(I can't cope with a 5.5) lo
Working on my next report

#12 Decay[151437]
66.44.173.23
Yeah, these strats may work against pubs, but there is no way you would win vs a half way decent player. Tanks are way more anti-p than they are anti-z btw. I think the saddest thing I saw was this: "Easy one, just make three or so nuclear silos" If you have the tech and resources to build 3 nuke silos and still have enough troops to defend them, then you dont need them at all, as you could run over that protoss player with ground. I would love to see you try to build three nukes vs a good toss player. But like Dag said, the writing was good.
#13 Sabotage[151438]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
cool that good writing will seep into my ownage br :D
#14 zeon[151439]
24.103.7.128
uh, i cant even view the report.
#15 zeon[151440]
24.103.7.128
Warning: file(/web/sites/battlereports.com/htdocs/users/newsabotage/Tguide/Terranguide.htm): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /web/sites/battlereports.com/includes/general.inc on line 539
#16 OverTheUnder[151441]
12-216-178-164.client.mchsi.com
o wow........i could have one hell of a time with this but i just stick with a few things>< First off-you dont need ANY marines with good scv micro, but i find it best to get 2 since that will hold goon off long enough your tank pops out maybe 5 seconds after he starts attackin wall and then its GG GOONS:P Most players don't wall vs zerg i actually find it nice when u are going metal/tank drop/wraith rush because it only gives lings one opening thuse you only need 1-2 scvs blocking it. There are better and cheaper strats though that can be done on maps such as LT. Take two scvs and block the ramp, then float the barracks over so they can't target the scvs and stick you 1 RINE behind it....they can't really do shit about it:P I have a new found respect for fire bats, i was just recently playing a normal TvP ( tank/vult push against goon/zeal/obs/hightemp) and i did a surprise fire bat drop, not only did it kill like all of his probes in seconds....but it TOOK DOWN THE NEXUS before anyone could get there...this all took place in like 15 seconds...so GG>< O, and you didn't mention TvT:P 6.5 Text was sorta small and hurt me eyes though><
#17 [151442]
68.79.174.39
Hrm looks like Sabotage has deleted the report, probably to fix some problem with it?

I checked the server and his HTML file is gone.

#18 [151443]
nr11-216-196-191-156.fuse.net
I'm guessed he deleted it because it got rated low.

=[

#19 OverTheUnder[151444]
12-216-178-164.client.mchsi.com
yea thats what he told me LOL>< o well
#20 badme[151445]
pcp05314423pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net
Be a man! Look at my first report. I didn't delete that, did I?! :(

-1.5 for cowardice.

#21 [151446]
68.79.174.39
Somebody look in their browser cache for it and email it to me. Or just reupload the darn thing. Deleting reports is a no no, even if they are your own!
#22 [151447]
68.79.174.39
By reupload, I mean he should reupload it.
#23 [151448]
129.142.195.30.ip.tele2adsl.dk
Commenting while reading, I'm picking out a few quotes here.

"When mess’n with the swarm tech immediately to siege tanks." - Errrr no.

"Have starports scattered throughout the map. Have them sitting on natural cliffs and places unreachable by cracklings and ultralisk." - This is just plan weird, but ok.

"[Tanks] Also pretty good against Protoss, but not the best." - Wtf. Nada and loads of other T's go pure tank vs. toss :D

"...he will pull at least one swarm on you before the end." - A swarm? So all zerg players round up a bunch of their own units and blindly attack atleast once every game?

Finish zergs off with a yamato push?

And then there's weird sentences throw in, like "Use precaution, Protoss players are commonly underestimated." They are? I'll tell that to Grrrr...

"Defense Matrix - It'll make a unit take 1 dmg per hit for a short length of time. Perfect for nuking. This one can really turn the tides if you're losing a ba" - This one is just plain wrong. It adds a shield that takes 250 damage (I think, can't remember exactly) before fading.

Okay, just finished reading. I'm sorry but you shouldn't make guides - this is likely to confuse other players instead of improving their game. Stick to the battlereporting :D

And one final note, god that font was small. Tiny small.

Sorry being harsh, but I'm thinking a 5





#24 [151449]
129.142.195.30.ip.tele2adsl.dk
Okaaaay just noticed report going away.

Well that changes everything O_O
#25 [151450]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
yeah that's immature :p

and not even in the "your mom" sense.
#26 [151451]
67.176.104.160
care to change votes to 2's?
#27 zeon[151452]
24.103.7.128
well, he was obviously expecting a ten rating for this, how sad for him.
#28 goldrush945[151453]
wc01.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Actually, Ling, the unit will still take a bit of damage under defensive matrix. :P
#29 OverTheUnder[151454]
12-216-178-164.client.mchsi.com
Yea even with D matrix the unit takes 1 dmg per hit. And yes it does last for 250 or until the time runs out:P And by swarm he ment dark swarm....GG u:P lol
#30 goldrush945[151455]
wc01.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Oh, and...

-> Nada and loads of other T's go pure tank vs. toss :D

No. Nada doesn't usually go pure tanks the whole way. Pure tanks gets raped up by zealots. He turtles with sieged tanks, and harasses with vultures to kill probes/distract the toss' army. Then, when he hits a critical mass, he runs over the toss with his 2/2 massive ground army. Which, coincidentally, in comprised almost entirely of tanks.
#31 goldrush945[151456]
wc01.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
-> And by swarm he ment dark swarm....

If you haven't reached tank tech by the time zerg has defilers and dark swarm, you're doing something horribly wrong.
#32 goldrush945[151457]
wc01.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Gogo me as comment whore. =/

-> "Have starports scattered throughout the map. Have them sitting on natural cliffs and places unreachable by cracklings and ultralisk." - This is just plan weird, but ok.

Starport tech is rarely seen other than for dropships. And then, 1 or 2 is fine. All of the others really suck against zerg; BCs and wraiths crumble versus scourge/hydras, and valks are decimated to scourge. That said, there are a few cases where it actually is used. But rarely, in my replay experience.

A lot of zergs go for drops, so it doesn't matter if its on a cliff ledge or not. Not to mention that if only ultras and lings come along, you can just lift off the buildings. =/
#33 goldrush945[151458]
wc01.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
*1 or 2 starports is fine for dropships and sci vessels. I can't believe I forgot the vessels. =/
#34 zeon[151459]
24.103.7.128
actually, wraiths are okay early game for overlord hunting.
#35 zeon[151460]
24.103.7.128
that is, if you see that the zerg has no anti-air...
#36 goldrush945[151461]
wc01.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
a couple of wraiths. But once the spores/scourge go up and hydras start popping out, they quickly lose their abilities.
#37 Dampiere[151462]
eris.uwimona.edu.jm
Pity its gone.. i would have liked to have seen that.. even for the entertainment value...
oh well.
May the Terrans Prosper
D
#38 Sabotage[151463]
ool-182e1a3b.dyn.optonline.net
i wasn't expecting a 10 i just -
#39 maareek[151464]
mblt-ac027.gtcom.net
Removing a report is just plain wrong. Heartcutter got a 3 for one of his "guides" and you didn't see him bitching.

It's going to take a lot for you to regain respect around here at least for me. Writing a report with problems is no big deal (look at mine) but just man up and take it. Making mistakes is the first step in growing to be good.
#40 zeon[151465]
24.103.7.128
word #39.

that said, since i didn't even read your report, i'll just say that i'd rather read something written by Heartcutter. c'mon, man, you never know, SOME one might like it, not all people are haters.
#41 Sabotage[151466]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
well, lesson learned never try anything new or maareek will h8 you. I dont understand why anyone would hate me because i screwed up a report ;[
<p>
Of course you'd rather read something by heartcutter. I'll repost it now.
#42 Sabotage[151467]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
lol didn't realize i put html in there
w/e i'll just face the bad ratings ur right its wrong to take it away.
#43 maareek[151468]
mblt-ac027.gtcom.net
I wasn't hating you for doing something new. I was berating you for taking a report away because it got rated poorly.

.Praetor has had reports rated worse than this, heartcutter has had reports rated lower than this, Zerg~Ling has had reports rated lower than this, and they didn't delete the report or beg Johnny to delete it.

I'm from the South, what you did is considered spineless around here. But I commend you at least for putting it back. Now let's see another report from you soon, you gotta crawl before you can walk.

Now I'll go read it.
#44 [151469]
67.176.104.160
"I'm from the South" hahahaha
#45 maareek[151470]
mblt-ac027.gtcom.net
I may be in the minority, but I actually enjoyed it. The writing was pretty good, the images were nice, the form was good.

It's status as a "Terran Handbook" is questionable. There were some good points but most of them are un-usable or overkill against most players.

All-in-all, a nice break from working on my reports. I'll comment more when I have more time, and I'd give it high silver.
#46 Shuriken[151471]
ool-182e1a3b.dyn.optonline.net
heh. read some of it.

pretty good man. nice strats that i often forget with terran.

gw. agreed with maareek; high silver

6
#47 badme[151472]
pcp05314423pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net
Eh. If you had put so more time into the writing and the pics, and had put forward better strats (Pretty much all of the ones you presented at the end were 'joke' strats that are near-useless in a serious game), and fixed up the formatting, I'd have said gold. As it stands now, starting at 7, -1 for cowardice, and -1 for bad information.
#48 badme[151473]
pcp05314423pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net
Ending with 5. Hit submit a but too soon there.
#49 badme[151474]
pcp05314423pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net
*bit
#50 Sabotage[151475]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
crawl b4 walk? :[ i can run i just screwed up.
#51 Sabotage[151476]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
I didn't beg johnny to delete it though
#52 [151477]
nr11-216-196-189-229.fuse.net
Johnny didn't, YOU did. Deleting a report because it's getting bad press is low. Bite the bullet.
#53 mattzarella[151478]
162.7.33.65.cfl.rr.com
ya my first report got an 8.5 and i cried for a good 3 hours, but i just grin and bear it
#54 goldrush945[151479]
CPE0080ad8222be-CM000a735cb980.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
I think he's learned the lesson after the 20+ comments people. -_-;;

The things that I don't like about your report:

1] Tiny font is bad.

2] No game. Show us why we should take your advice.

3] No pics to shows us what the heck you're talking about. I mean, it's far easier to see what you're trying to show when there's a picture illustrating it.

4] The dependence on 'get x amount of x'. Every game is different. Therefore, every game will require a difference mix/amount of troops.

And that's without even commenting on the strategy bit about it. :o However, it's obvious to me that you did put a fair amount of work into it. Good effort, not so good execution. That's about a silver in my book.
#55 [151480]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
OMG:

"I'm from the South, what you did is considered spineless around here. But I commend you at least for putting it back. Now let's see another report from you soon, you gotta crawl before you can walk."


that has to be quoted, no offense but it's the funniest thing I've seen here for years.

Anyway, the whole matter of regaining respect is silly, you were disappointed and did something stupid, so who cares anyway. Raters now are professional enough to rate reports regardless of the author, and on a case by case basis :].

And yes, tanks are much better VS toss ;)
#56 [151481]
va-65-40-126-21.dyn.sprint-hsd.net
irradiate
ir-radiate

seeing irridate is like fingernails on chalkboard for me TT
#57 [151483]
67.176.104.160
holy cow you found your tag?
#58 Sabotage[151484]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
hm #54 theres a TvZ rep actually that shows irradiate owning zerg (and wraiths) its before the chart.
#59 Cod[151486]
67-40-25-105.tukw.qwest.net
This is the fucking stupidest thing that I have ever read, Chick tracts notwithstanding
You have no idea what you're talking about at all
Your "report" is a combination of the extremely obvious and the grossly inaccurate
You can't spell
You can't write
Your knowledge of grammar is reminiscent of mine...when I was in first grade
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: stick to writing dissertations on stuff you actually know about
Playing Brood War is obviously not something that you know about

Goodbye
#60 Sabotage[151487]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
y do you have to be such an asshole cod
that's not cool. I'm aware that you're an awesome sc player though.
#61 Raider[151488]
pcp02066469pcs.11thav01.fl.comcast.net
I'm with Cod. This is a combination of Blizzard's guide to Brood War and B.net SC forums.

#62 [151489]
user-12l2ep3.cable.mindspring.com
I give this a 7. Its a solid effort, and even though many may debate the strats, we all have different skill levels so it is hard to judge. I thought it was well done though, so that's why it gets a 7 in my book. Many of those strats I've used at one time or another back in the day.
#63 Raider[151490]
pcp02066469pcs.11thav01.fl.comcast.net
Doh, clicked submit by accident before finishing.

Despite being rather useless as far sa strats go at this point in BW development, your report shows that you can write well, so I am looking forward to an actual report by you.
#64 Sabotage[151491]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
yea thx man
yea im doing a report too thx
#65 Shuriken[151492]
ool-182e1a3b.dyn.optonline.net
heh that 7 really helps

yea man i wanna c that br coming up
#66 badme[151493]
pcp05314423pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net
ROFL at #59.

The comparison to Chick tracts made my day ;)
#67 mattzarella[151494]
162.7.33.65.cfl.rr.com
alright sabotage, we watched your replay and i've come to a very simple conclusion.

what you did was read the official SC guide and play one TvZ game in which you based that entire guide on. you used wraiths in that game because your opponent - listen carefully - blew total nuts. he didn't expand well, he didn't create proper combinations of units, he didn't bring detection half the time, among other things.

you, on the other hand, ended up at the end of the game with almost 10k in minerals and 5k gas. all you did was turtle - he even killed your main once - and make wraiths, which were inopportune for him. had he not been a complete retard, he may have made hydralisks.. well, we'll never know, as the retarded usually aren't too keen in getting points across.

regardless, next time please don't base all of your experience in bw on a single game. don't say that you didn't, because you very clearly did. almost every strategy in this report (including mass random starports) was in the replay. find mehdi and ask him for a tvz game, because i'm sure he'll make you bleed from your ass after what you've just said.

it was an effort, though.
#68 [151495]
user-12l2ep3.cable.mindspring.com
This comments sections was entertainment for me today. BTW thanks for reuploading the report for us. I am annoyed enough about all the broken images from early reports. A problem I am going to great technical lengths to fix.
#69 goldrush945[151497]
CPE0080ad8222be-CM000a735cb980.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
-> hm #54 theres a TvZ rep actually that shows irradiate owning zerg (and wraiths) its before the chart.

Oh... ok. I just downloaded it and watched it. What I meant was to put it in your report, so that you could explain your thought process. But, since you pointed it out:

1] 2 scv's on gas for about a minute is bad
2] scout came out way too late; off of depot is a must, in my opinion, because of zerg's rushing potential
3] why put your academy outside of your base? You aren't fooling anyone (it's right outside your ramp), and it's easy prey to lurkers/mutas
4] zerg should've scouted your metal build (drone) and gone for muta/ling + fast expo (it owns metal). No turrets and not much anti-air means a field day for mutas Instead, he went lurkers versus 2 fact tanks. =/
5] the point of getting a wraith early is to score a few overlord kills before he gets speed. Oh, and to scout a bit too. Leaving your wraiths in your base doesn't do either of those things.
6] 2-3 idle SCVs

Do I really have to continue? --;; That was 9 minutes into the game.

Still, I don't want to take away from your effort/pride in winning that game. (I'm assuming he won it) Good effort on the guide.
#70 [151498]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
the fact that this has 70 comments already, which is more than Lucky and Lepton's BRs combined, is kinda sad :[
#71 Sabotage[151499]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
yea but only cuz pepl are like "wtf " or "nice effort" that makes 71 ;p
#72 Sabotage[151500]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
haha i did 14 of em too
#73 zeon[151501]
24.103.7.128
Yah, and those 70 comments acculumated pretty quick.
#74 Shuriken[151518]
ool-182e1a3b.dyn.optonline.net
yea....damn
#75 Decay[151530]
66.44.173.38
oh we're all helping it with these "yea"s


































Doh, theres my contribution.
#76 OverTheUnder[151538]
12-216-178-164.client.mchsi.com
yea.....
#77 Sabotage[151539]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
rofl this was funny and fun.
#78 BlueRibbon[151541]
65.167.44.33
A few things:
1) M&M do not RAPE hydralisks <i>that</i> hard. Good numbers of Hydralisks will cut down M&M.
2) Never move quickly to block vs Zerg unless you are suicidal. Depot, Rax, Rax, Depot, (generally not arranged in a block) into Factory, Tanks, Port, Vessels, is much better.
3) Centered text? No captialization skills? Bad sentence structure? Run-on's? You barbarian.
4) Seemed like it wasn't a real attempt, and you are certainly no Heartcutter. :[
#79 BlueRibbon[151542]
65.167.44.33
"A swarm? So all zerg players round up a bunch of their own units and blindly attack at least once every game?"

Ling. <3.
#80 .Praetor[151544]
c-67-172-163-127.client.comcast.net
Bastard. Stealing all my comments. Actually, to those who say we old reporters don't whine about deleting bad reports... well that's true. But I secretly crave to put some damn BR tags in my oldest reports. (No tabs in HTML... who knew?) And if given the opportunity, whole comments (all written by me) would be deleted without any mention or disclosure whatsoever.
#81 OverTheUnder[151546]
12-216-178-164.client.mchsi.com
sorry blue but M&M do indeed rape pure hydra...as long as you are on the same upgrades:D if u had a group of 36 marines with maybe 12 meds or so....it would take an ENDLESS supply of hydra to beat that:/
#82 Dibbler[151547]
194.151.4.99
I suck at bw so I'll not comment on the content of your guide. But looking at the amount of comments you generated, some of them interspersed with tactical advice, you should at least get credit for providing an interesting report. Why else all the comments?
#83 goldrush945[151548]
CPE0080ad8222be-CM000a735cb980.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
-> 2) Never move quickly to block vs Zerg unless you are suicidal. Depot, Rax, Rax, Depot, (generally not arranged in a block) into Factory, Tanks, Port, Vessels, is much better.

Against quick Lurker tech, you want to go out and delay lurker movement as long as possible with your initial m&m force. That means watching for the lurkers to come out, stim, attack while they're unburrowed, run away when they burrow, and stop right outside their range. repeat as necessary.

However, against quick mutas, you want to keep most of you m&m force at home to defend against them. build 2-3 turrets at the minerals to delay (they won't do shit against 12 mutas microed properly) the mutas until the infantry arrive.
#84 OverTheUnder[151550]
12-216-178-164.client.mchsi.com
Also a drop Almost alwayz GG's Three Hatch Mutas... by the time you drop there spire is Just finishing or there mutas are jsut building, u will be able to kill drones... and w/e tech buildings they have there and probably the hatchery:/
#85 [151557]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
I just watched this replay, and I have to admit I am speechless.

Everything mattz said, I guess, except more extreme.
#86 [151558]
inecce-pxy05.zcce.compaq.com
This might be the worst guide ever

but it was written without a crayon, therefore you do not get a 1.

3
#87 Sabotage[151560]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
raters are really different lol from 3-7 this crud thing got lol
#88 adrenaling[151567]
CPE00a065cb0ceb-CM014100005949.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
Fox hath spoken.
#89 BlueRibbon[151572]
65.167.44.106
I didn't say "pure" Hydra. I said, "Good numbers of" :}
#90 Chris[151574]
ip65.aircloud-com.sfo.ygnition.net
Sounds like what I used to think about starcraft strategy when I was 11.
#91 .Praetor[151579]
c-67-172-163-127.client.comcast.net
Yeah, rating is sort of an inexact science. Heck, I once gave the same report a 1, a 7, and a 10.
#92 kane[151580]
c-67-170-196-151.client.comcast.net
down with terry pratchett-inspired names
#93 Cod[151584]
67-40-25-105.tukw.qwest.net
I'm not trying to be an asshole, your report really was bad! WHAT was the point of writing this? You automatically put yourself in a bad spot by writing about something which you clearly aren't qualified to (Broodwar). Let me put it this way: if George W. Bush or John Kerry were to write about the horrors of living in the ghettos of Black America, would it be informative or definitive? If some random kid who had been taking cello lessons for a few years were to play Dvorak's B-minor concerto, would it sound good compared to Rostropovich's recording? Hell no on both counts!
This is why battle reports are easier to write than guides. In guides, there will always be someone better than you telling you that you're full of shit. When you write a BR, _you_ are the sole witness of the game. As such, you alone are qualified to write about it. _You_ are the ultimate authority and expert on the game. This puts you in a much better position already!
My criticism of this report isn't to tell you to stop writing; quite the opposite. I'm telling you what you did wrong, so you can fix that in your next report.
You are capable of doing better than this.
#94 Sabotage[151585]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
oh thats cool man ;]
I'm making a br btw
#95 Raider[151587]
pcp02066469pcs.11thav01.fl.comcast.net
not sure about the report, but Sabotage is a comment whore :O
#96 [151596]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Cod's comment is 100% right.
#97 [151602]
inecce-pxy05.zcce.compaq.com
cod has spoken
#98 TwistedNecro[151629]
lsanca1-ar54-4-3-202-139.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net
lol

Geez, almost 100 comments... Do you know what that means?
#99 TwistedNecro[151630]
lsanca1-ar54-4-3-202-139.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net
SPAM!
#100 TwistedNecro[151631]
lsanca1-ar54-4-3-202-139.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net
Okay maybe not, I just want #100! =)
#101 Sabotage[151632]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
ah 100 comments
#102 Sabotage[151633]
pool-68-161-122-116.ny325.east.verizon.net
damn you!
#103 kane[151637]
c-67-170-196-151.client.comcast.net
only a dork like cod would put a rostopovitch reference in a flame
#104 [151703]
67.176.104.160
cod vs kane, bw, best of 3

i br, gogogo
#105 [152021]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
wraiths are alright tvt, thats just about it.
#106 Desert Demon[152089]
user-0ce2k6v.cable.mindspring.com
"seeing irridate is like fingernails on chalkboard for me TT"

Damn true ;o
#107 your friend[152352]
pool-68-237-56-179.ny325.east.verizon.net
hey brian ^^ y u still on starcraft ><
#108 Sabotage[153000]
ool-44c25deb.dyn.optonline.net
pen0r
#109 DoNotReaDdiS[155612]
px4so.cg.shawcable.net
i CouLdNt ReAd The rePoRt CauSe the WoRdS are ToO dAm SmAll
#110 Jeremy[157200]
ool-182e1a3b.dyn.optonline.net
haha remember this?
#111 Sabotage (orangeownage)[160543]
140.112.65.196
piece of shit and i was gay about it lol



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report