| #1 Razoriel[157935] |
| CPE-141-168-21-154.nsw.bigpond.net.au |
| 1st non-author! |
| #2 goldrush945[157936] |
| CPE0080ad8222be-CM000a735cb980.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
| Pretty good. I personally prefer less of contractions (in the form of 'lotsa' and 'cos'), because they take away from a smooth reading experience. A few places where you step back and start explaining exactly why they're doing what they are would also be helpful to me. |
| #3 Razoriel[157937] |
| CPE-141-168-21-154.nsw.bigpond.net.au |
Well, that's the way the Orks speak, so it's necessary :D.
I thought it was a very good report, and I particularly liked the quotes you had in between areas, especially the 'Orks are never beat' and 'Why humies are stoopid'. A lot better than your previous report. 9, maybe even 10. |
#4  [157938] |
| usrns85.dialup.hawaii.edu |
Generally speaking whenever you rewrite a report you overwrite the old one, even if its a major overhaul. Reports once rated are usually not done again by the same raters even after changes (Breeze's "For Aiur" for example). 'Get it right the first time' is pretty much the motto.
Having this in another report isn't really bad but this probably shouldn't be rated either.
On the report:
This was a nice improvement over the original. Much more detail and explanations were helpful. Game still didn't seem that great or you didn't emphasize the right points. The climactic battle of the game seemed to be the when the BM squad teleported into the SM army but it wasn't emphasized much in the text or pictures (just another battle feel). After that the Orks were pretty much overwhelmed by superior numbers and firepower.
I'd give this one an 8-8.5 if I were to rate it again. |
| #5 Crazster[157939] |
| n218103254150.netvigator.com |
| 6th |
| #6 dustbiter[157940] |
| bbcache-114.singnet.com.sg |
I never wanted the old ratings to be changed, I just wanted to do a new one to correct some stuff. Fair enough if you don't want to rate the new one cos' you've rated the old one.
But I don't see why you'll encourage this report to be left unrated. It's after all a different report.
On the Big Mek thing i thought the pic of the BM advancing on running marines was enough. It was more significant that the wartrakks got knocked out.
goldrush945:
I thought a few contractions are okay, it's faster reading. I noticed them but left them in. I feel explaining things to exact detail kills the pace, which is why I made a large separate game mechanics section. |
| #7 Convider[157941] |
| HSE-Toronto-ppp304966.sympatico.ca |
Change alt text into title text please.
Contractions like lotsa annoyed me, it's only a few more characters, what have you got to lose?
The backgrounds were annoying, usually you would want something with low contrast, fairly opposite to your text colour. The brightened sides of the space background frustrated me, and I didnt even want to try to read it with the secound background.
The battles seemed very one-sided for most of the report.
7 |
| #8 PeaceableGhost[157942] |
| 198.109.221.121 |
Interesting... the game seemed kinda one-sided, inly it was hard to tell. The Ork seemed better at production, but the SM did better with tactics...
Only contractions I noticed (other than the normal English ones) were Ork-talk, and kinda unavioidable.
I'm thinking about 8, and I don't really remember the other report. |
| #9 dustbiter[157943] |
| bbcache-116.singnet.com.sg |
Convider:
I only noticed a few contractions which slipped in when I was explaining ork squad stuff, so I left it in cos' I found it funny.
On how 1 sided it seems, DoW 1 on 1 games tend to resolve pretty quickly. Once you're losing, it's quite a slippery slope. The game's of a pretty decent length for 1 on 1.
I found the report readable personally, while checking text/layout and all. What brightened sides on the space background? Yeah grey burns my eyes. I think your settings are too bright or something.
PeaceableGhost:
Ork units are cheaper and more numerous. Yeah the old report wasn't very memorable hehe.
|
| #10 Woah[157945] |
| ce01pc02.netcabo.net |
An step of giant from last report, this was actually an very enojoyable read :) but indeed the game could be better :P.
Lack of strategic insight on the game is the only problem with it in my eyes, real nice pictures and the text goes pretty well with the game, good job! |
| #11 notsoskinnyguy[157949] |
| rrcs-24-172-65-130.midsouth.biz.rr.com |
wow reports seem to have slowed to nothing in the recent weeks.
Cool report. Dow games are usually one sided |
| #12 RabidMurloc[157950] |
| ool-43516e69.dyn.optonline.net |
| Cool. I sure as hell can't compete with this. Oh well, I can always do Homeworld 2, right? Please nobody report on that, it is mine all mine! MUAHAHAHAHAHA! Ahem, sorry. Sometimes I go mad with power. In the immortal words of Terranred: Febreeze. Febreeze solves everything. |
| #13 BeRzErKeR[157951] |
| 216.49.74.174 |
| what is Febreeze? |
| #14 www.febreeze.com[157955] |
| user-0ce2k7e.cable.mindspring.com |
| |
| #15 BeRzErKeR[157957] |
| 216.49.74.174 |
lol
|
| #16 [157968] |
| pool-70-111-83-142.nwrk.east.verizon.net |
| I was quoting from Twinkin' out with Red Mage. That place is cool. |
| #17 Dice[158105] |
| nj-65-164-22-169.dyn.sprint-hsd.net |
| I give it a 8/10 the quotes were good (I love the one from the ork codex) and the writing was superb anyway if any of you plan on doing a report on the new daemon hunters mod don't even think about it f you do I will hunt you down kill you bring you back to life then kill you again jk lol |
| #18 Dice[158106] |
| nj-65-164-22-169.dyn.sprint-hsd.net |
| **if** |
| #19 Dice[158121] |
| nj-65-164-22-169.dyn.sprint-hsd.net |
| oh and if anyone wants to try the demo go to gamespot.com and become a member its free and easy |
| #20 JV[160461] |
| 68.79.174.39 |
| Testing change to comment section |
| #21 guest[162274] |
| cpe-24-27-81-213.houston.res.rr.com |
| please write another! It was so good! Better than the first one! |
Home
Forum
Starcraft Tournaments
